Thursday, April 09, 2009

Madhesh Think Tank: A Reply To Ratan Jha

Nepalese Constituent Assembly election, 2008Image via Wikipedia

Ratan Jha: "I agree with Divita, Subhash ji, Lalit and other Members of this esteemed Forum...."

Ratanji. This is your usual tactic of listing a bunch of names to try and show a lot of people are behind you. Divita Mehta: "I personally think that the
discussions in this forum are extremely valuable and should be made public...." It was Subhash Shah who brought up the idea of structure for this forum and I responded with this: http://madhesi5.googlepages.com Lalit Jha and Ram Shah talked of "taking this forum to the next level," and I responded with this: http://madhesi5.googlepages.com I came up with a set of ideas, put them out for public discussion, respected the resulting majority voiced opinion, and settled on a creative resolution. But that nowhere ever meant I said bye bye to the Bill Of Rights for me. Free speech still rings true.

" ....Paramendra's "*His Way or Highway*" approach. If I recall correctly, it was his similar approach that led to removal of his membership from the ND Forum couple of years ago. Personally, I do NOT receive Paramendra's mail as I've marked them "SPAM". Nonetheless, I do get some of his mails in conjunction with other members' e-mails"

On the ND Forum issue looks to me like Sukhdev Shah and I stand on one side, and you on the other side. http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2007/02/kiran-sitoula-is-short-fat-idiot.html

Diaspora Dynamics
Phone Talk With Girija Koirala: Meeting History Itself
January 12 Janakpur, January 20 Kathmandu
Time For Madhesi Militancy Is Now
NDF Owner, Stop This Nonsense, Reinstate Immediately
ND Dynamics
The Cloud Model, Not The Pyramid Model
ND Glasnost
Diaspora Logistical Help To The Movement

I got kicked out of the ND Forum for this: Project Nepal Democracy: 5 Projects

The prejudiced Pahadis of the ND Forum became extremely uncomfortable that I intended to play a central role into Nepal's democracy movement - which I did, thanks to the digital democracy ways - and they did the cowardly thing of kicking me out. Which other Nepali in America, Pahadi or Madhesi, worked full time for the April Revolution? Name one other. You can't. There is no other. But the Pahadis still felt the need to disrespect me. The question is, why do you feel the need to join them?

Let's face it. You have made a second career out of getting along with the prejudiced Pahadis of the diaspora. It is the Mr. 1% mentality. We Madhesis are 1% of the Nepal Army, and 1% of the Nepali diaspora. So we try a little too hard to get along. We try not to offend.

Rakesh Mishra also got kicked out of that ND Forum recently. What do you make of that?

The curious thing though is what we Madhesis are in Nepal - disenfranchised, marginalized, powerless - the Pahadis are on the global stage. They mirror the mental slavery ways of the Madhesi on the global stage. They need help and they know it.

Internalized Racism Among Nepalis In NYC
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/05/internalized-racism-among-nepalis-in.html
Madhesi Self Hate
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/08/madhesi-self-hate.html
MaMaMaMa
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/06/mamamama.html
मधेशीसँग संख्या छ ...
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/05/blog-post.html
Bahun, Chhetri, Sunni
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/06/bahun-chhetri-sunni.html

"Regarding your comments about ANTA and its ELITE members, I feel happy when people feel that I'm rich (or elite). I rather be rich than poor. Won't you like to be the same? Otherwise, why would you be involved with one of the most riskiest type of investment venture?"

I don't know you are rich. But if you are, I am happy for you. I admire successful people, especially those from backgrounds that put major hurdles in the way, like the Madhesi of Nepal. I don't begrudge anyone's success. What I do have issues is with the elitism, this attitude that we intend to speak on behalf of the Madhesi masses, but think they are too beneath us to be part of our conversations.

True, my tech startup is a high risk venture, and the potential rewards are correspondingly huge, but what really drives me there is the vision statement: to con

"Lastly, with respect to our time commitment, we have our family, then our job/business, and then only ANTA/Madhesh Think Tank/ ND/NRNA/NAC,etc. We, the ANTA Executives, very well know how to prioritize our time, and we feel extremely proud and content about what we have achieved with ANTA and other similar social organizations. Nevertheless, I do agree that a lot more can be done, and we'll continue to do our best."

You are talking to the guy who launched ANTA in New York where ANTA has its largest presence, although the credit for expansion goes to ther people. I was part of the conversations that launched the Madhesi organizations in India, and Britain. You happened not to be. But it is a good thing you have interacted with them later.

If it is okay to criticize the Madhesi political parties, it is okay to criticize the Madhesi diaspora organizations. Why are you getting so defensive? Unless you criticize, how will you take them to the next level?

The summary phrase for this whole discussion is mental slavery. People have the option to disagree with me, people have the option to not even read my thoughts, and people have the option to outvote me, and people have exercised all those options at one time or another, but people still get agitated. It is because I am challenging people's mental slavery thought patterns and that makes them uncomfortable.

Paramendra Bhagat http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
President, Hamro Nepal http://hamnep.googlepages.com
Chairperson, JyotiConnect Inc. http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Madhesh Think Tank: February 2009 And Before
Madhesh Think Tank: Sukhdev Sah, Tharu Movement, Dalit
Madhesh Think Tank: Board
Madhesh Think Tank: Murari Raj Sharma, Upendra Yadav
Madhesh Think Tank: Links, Hindi
Madhesh Think Tank: Ek Terai, Jhijhiya, Open Border
Madhesh Think Tank: Mayawati, Laloo, Manmohan, Gmail
Madhesh Think Tank: Gayatri Shah, Ek Terai
An Opaque Madhesh Think Tank
Broadband And Madhesi Liberation
Madhesi Gathering: Shangrila: Jay Kishan Heights: New Year
Global Madhesi Organization

Madhesi All Round Development

(1) Political Leadership For Ek Terai, Ek Rajya

The major Madhesi parties give us hope like the Madhesi members of the
three big Pahadi parties don't. But we have to engage those Madhesis
also. Our immediate goal is Ek Terai, Ek Rajya. For that we have to
seek a coalition not only of the Madhesi parties, but also the Madhesi
MPs of the three Pahadi parties.

(2) Second Goal: National Leadership

After Ek Terai is achieved, and Nepal gets a new constitution, the
Madhesi Movement's next goal is going to be to get a popularly elected
Madhesi president/prime minister for Nepal. For that goal to be met we
are going to have to work to unify all Madhesi parties. We might start
with that goal and still not manage to rope in all of them. But even
if we manage to rope in most and not all of them, the goal could be
achieved.

In a democracy, it is not age or wealth that decides who the leader
is. Right now as the leader of the largest Madhesi party, Upendra
Yadav has a just claim to the leadership position. It is not Mahantha
Thakur, much as I respect the guy. He is a "parosiya" from Sarlahi.

But after unification if at a party convention someone like Hridayesh
Tripathy, Rajendra Mahato, Jay Prakash Gupta, Bijay Gachhedar, or some
fifth person gets elected party president, that new person gets to
lead. It is for the democratic process to decide who the leader is
going to be.

(3) Immediate Goal: A New Madhesi Identity

Manjil Ek Aur Rahi Do, Phir Pyar Kaise Na Ho? The Madhesi want Ek
Madhesh, Ek Pradhesh, the Tharus want Ek Tharuhat, Ek Pradesh. We go
for Ek Terai, Ek Rajya. We have to seek middle ground. We have to work
for equality for the Dalits, the Muslims, and upward socio-economic
mobility for them and the Tharus and the other Janajatis. Just like
the Nepali identity so far has not been inclusive, the Madhesi
identity so far has not been inclusive. The Madhesi women so far have
not been treated equal. That has to change over time. We have to
reinvent the Madhesi identity so that the Dalit, Muslim, Women and
Tharus feel at home in that identity, because it is the Tharus that
will make a Madhesi-Janajati coalition possible. Laloo created the
Muslim-Yadav coalition, we have to create a Madhesi-Janajati
coalition.

(4) Madhesi Diaspora Organizations

There is not enough democracy and transparency in the Madhesi diaspora
organizations. They are almost allergic to the idea of going mass-
based. They suffer from elitism. They have an exaggerated sense of how
much they matter to the Madhesi movers and shakers in Nepal. They
suffer more from homesickness than from a strong urge to serve the
masses back home. They don't talk to each other enough. At some level
they are fundamentally disrespectful of the leading Madhesis in Nepal
who are working under tough conditions. At least they are there in the
trenches. We are not.


Apr 7, 9:29 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 7 2009 9:29 pm
Subject: Re: Madhesi: All Round Development

Purushottam Shah: "I have seen you advocating for unification of three
Madhesi parties very strongly in several of your write-ups and
discussion forums. You have also presented a proposal that looks fair
and democratic enough for all the sides involved who have stakes.
Madhesis, as a whole too want this. So, as it must be apparent, what
is stopping them from uniting? Are the egos and sense of pride over
being the party chairman of a party of Nepal stopping them from doing
so? In their mind, are they thinking that being the party chairman of
a 3 MP party is better than being the secretary-general or party
spokesperson of the party that would command nearly the second largest
numbers of MPs or aggregate votes? ............ Who should push in
this regard? I see that you (Paramendra) do know the party-heads
personally, what was their explanation for not moving forward for a
unification?"

Right now I am busy with my own stuff, but over time I hope to start
working the phones to make this happen, or at least give it a good
try. I might be the best person to work on this. One, I am neutral.
Two, I have no career interests the way I might have had if I were in
Nepal and politically affiliated and active. I might be that one
person who personally knows the top leaders in all the Madhesi
parties, and I garner political respect and admiration across the
board. Maybe I will get listened to. I don't think we are running late
on this one. But I do need to pitch in.

The idea is right. The formula is fair. But the work will have to
happen over the phone, and it will take a little time.

Otherwise I am in good standing across the board. For a few years
between high school and college I was politicking in Nepal. I was Vice
General Secretary to the Nepal Samajwadi Janata Dal that had two MPs.
Hridayesh Tripathy was General Secretary. Sarita Giri was yet another
Vice General Secretary. Rajendra Mahto was Central Committee member,
and he made a point to publicly state that fact at a Madhesi event in
Jackson Heights when he was in NYC as a Cabinet member. I am friends
with Hridayeshji's wife, I know Rajendraji's wife. I know some of
their children. I mean, it is not all political. We have a friendship
that goes back a decade and a half. I know other leaders in those two
parties, people like Anil Jha.

When Upendra Yadav landed in Los Angeles in July 2007 for the annual
conference of Nepalis in America, his first words were "Where is
Paramendra Bhagat?" They took him to the hotel. He again asked, "Where
is Paramendra Bhagat?" They had to fly him over to NYC to meet me.

The first time I called up Jay Prakash Gupta, he said, "Ye to mera
ahobhagya hai ki aap ne mujhe phone kiya." I had never met him before,
never called him before, never corresponded.

I personally don't know anyone from the Dalit Janajati Party, or the
Nepali Janata Dal, but that can change fast after I start working the
phones, which might be in a few weeks, or a few months, depending on
how much space I can make and how soon.

I would probably tap on a network of volunteers to work the phones. We
diaspora Madhesis are in a unique position to help bring together the
various Madhesi parties.

http://madhesi5.googlepages.com/upendrayadav
http://madhesi5.googlepages.com/rajendramahto

Along those lines, I have two other related stories.

I was at a Nepali event in Jackson Heights in Queens. Some MPs from
Nepal were on stage. I was sitting in the front row. Hundreds were in
attendance. In the middle of the program one MP got off stage to come
sit one seat from me to get his picture taken with me. Then he got
embarrassed and said he was trying to get the crowd into the
background of the picture.

In February 2006 Madhav Nepal, then leader of the largest political
party in the country, was put under house arrest by the royal regime.
A month later he managed to come online wireless. His brother lived in
the house next to his. The first person he contacted was me. We
chatted on Google Talk. Madhav Nepal is a Pahadi.

All the top politicians in Nepal know me or of me, and that is a good
standing to have if you are going to work to unify the various Madhesi
parties.

I know politics and group dynamics the way Binod Shah knows medicine,
the way Ratan Jha knows engineering.

When Bill Gates was 19, he launched a company. When I was 19, I
launched a political party.

I am a digital democrat. That is my newest political incarnation.

Apr 8, 1:28 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Apr 8 2009 1:28 pm
Subject: Re: Re- mdheshi: all round development to Paramendra

Kritji.

Mahanta ki baat nahin hai. I could not operate on somebody, I am not a
surgeon. But if a surgeon were to circulate his resume, would he be
flaunting, and being immodest?

Madhesi diaspora organizations are subject to criticism just like
Madhesi political parties. We should have open, healthy discussions so
as to make them better.

"....who writes your material..."

This is a strange question. I write my stuff myself. Who do you think
writes my material?

"Ek Pardesh ek Terai is absolutely bad for the general public of
Terai"

Ok so we disagree on this. I have said why I am for Ek Terai, Ek
Rajya, but you have not said why you are against Ek Terai, Ek Rajya.
Would you like to share your reasons?

"Madheshi leaders are as bad as Pahadiya leaders"

Political leaders are public figures subject to criticism. Sure. But
it shows your political naivete to lump all politicians together. That
is kind of like saying all western women are "loose!" Which is a
sexist thing to say, and exhibits ignorance.

"Doesn't racism and discrimination exist in the Terai"

If you have been reading my recent posts, you will realize I have time
and again empathized with the Dalits, the Muslims, the women, the
Tharus of the Terai. But because all that inequality exists, and so
there is no point in fighting for equality for Madhesis on the
national scene, that line of thought is exactly what the Khas rulers
want you to have. You are making them happy.

"Please do Think about what are you saying and consider what will be
the impacts of the action on general public"

I do that ALL the time.

" 4 weeks ago I was in Nepal and have seen the condition of the Terai
Basi"

It would be more helpful if you were to be more descriptive in terms
of what you saw on the ground. Would you like to share some of the
revealing conversations you had with people?



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Madhesh Think Tank: February 2009 And Before

Image representing Google Groups as depicted i...Image via CrunchBase

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank (private)

Govt lists 92 caste groups as Madhesi

Feb 26, 2:32 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Feb 26 2009 2:32 pm
Subject: Re: Govt lists 92 caste groups as Madhesi

http://myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=2243

This is an important development.

(1) Now the Bahuns don't get to claim they are also Madhesi. If they
live in Terai, they are Teraiwasi. They don't become white when they
live in America either.

(2) Tharu are Madhesi. Just like Madhesi Dalit is both Dalit and
Madhesi. The Tharu are very much Madhesi.

Law And Order In The Terai

Feb 28, 12:28 am
From: paramendra
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 28 2009 12:28 am
Subject: Law And Order In The Terai

7,000 Martyrs: A Maoist Farce
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/02/7000-martyrs-maoist-farce.html

The Pahadi power structure is systematically punishing the Madhesi
population in the Terai by intentionally going slack on law and order
in the Terai. The punishment is for giving a big victory to the
Madhesi parties on April 10, 2008. The Pahadi police that openly sided
with the Pahadi rioters in Nepalgunj in December 2006 are now doing
something similar by acting absent while on duty. They used to
practice active suppression during the Panchayat. Now they are
punishing the Madhesi population by going passive in the line of duty
and, worse, actively colluding with criminal elements to make life
hell for the Madhesi population. This attitude is a recipe for a
disintegration of the country. Remember Bangladesh?

National Coalition Against Racial Discrimination: Proposed
Constitution
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/02/national-coalition-against-racial.html

ग्रीन कार्ड भनेको भिसा जस्तो हो

Feb 26, 5:17 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:17:28 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 26 2009 5:17 pm
Subject: ग्रीन कार्ड भनेको भिसा जस्तो हो

ग्रीन कार्ड भनेको भिसा जस्तो हो
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/02/blog-post.html

उपेन्द्र यादव विदेश मन्त्री भएको बेलामा मधेसी पार्टीहरूले एक भएर
अमेरिकाकालागि नेपाली राजदुत भनेर सुकदेव साहको नाम सिफारिस गरे। सुकदेव
साहको नाम पहाडीहरूलाई बाँदरको हातमा नरिवल भएको छ। मान्छेलाई
disqualified भन्न भएन। सुकदेव साहभन्दा qualified मान्छे नेपालमा छँदै
छैन। अनि कोहीलाई के सुर्ता ज्वाईलाई खानैको सुर्ता भने जस्तो सुकदेव
साहसँग त ग्रीन कार्ड छ भनेर they have started running up and down the
street, बाहुनले च्याउ खाअोस् न स्वाद पाअोस् भने जस्तो।

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

An Opaque Madhesh Think Tank

Feb 24, 1:34 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:34:00 -0500
Subject: An Opaque Madhesh Think Tank

An Opaque Madhesh Think Tank
http://madhesi.blogspot.com/2009/02/opaque-madhesh-think-tank.html

If the Madhesi Think Tank is not going to make its archives public, it
is of little personal interest to me. Mohi magne dhungro lukaune?

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Feb 24, 5:54 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Feb 24 2009 5:54 pm
Subject: Re: An Opaque Madhesh Think Tank

Bijay Raut: "we can do a democratic voting off the Think Tank group,
and make a decision based on it. "

That would be the best way.

Feb 25, 10:18 am
From: paramendra
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 06:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Feb 25 2009 10:18 am
Subject: Re: An Opaque Madhesh Think Tank

I think Balkrishna has brought forth an important point.

Preserving the sense of community in this forum should perhaps be the
number one priority.

As a strong proponent of making the archives public, I want to go on
record to say I see the light in the opposing viewpoint.

But this new development also has helped me appreciate the value of an
open discussion where people respectfully air their opinions and learn
from each other.

Since we Madhesis are such a small portion of the Nepali diaspora,
making the archives public might dissuade many from airing their views
openly. Most abstain as is.

Perhaps we should preserve the original character of this forum and
keep it private, those wishing to more publicly air their views might
want to join this crowd here: http://ndforum.blogspot.com Those
wishing to do both, it is as easy as copy and paste.

Make The Madhesi Think Tank Archives Public

Feb 19, 3:56 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:56:46 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 19 2009 3:56 pm
Subject: Make The Madhesi Think Tank Archives Public

Access http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank/about
Only members can view group content
Only members can view group members list
People can request an invitation to join
Members can create and edit pages
Members can upload files
Only members can post

I can see why only select members may join this think tank, otherwise
things would go out of hand, and the quality of the conversation would
go downhill. But it makes no sense to not allow anyone and everyone to
view the archives. There are many people who might not qualify to join
this think tank, but who should have every right to follow the
discussions here. Our current arrangement is undemocratic and opaque.
It is too cliquish. "Only members can view group content." I request
the group administrator Bijay Raut to please make the archives public.
Thanks.

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Feb 20, 12:04 am
From: paramendra
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:04:37 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Feb 20 2009 12:04 am
Subject: Re: Make The Madhesi Think Tank Archives Public

I am not opposed to being liberal about who to let join the group and
who not to. I think anyone so far has had the option to come to the
MTT site and make a request with the administrator saying they wish to
join. They can write a paragraph introducing themselves and making a
case as to why they need to be allowed in. That arrangement has always
been in place.

But not everyone wants to write and discuss. Most people seem to
prefer to just read. Or there would be a ton of comments at my blog.

Feb 22, 5:47 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 22 2009 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: Make The Madhesi Think Tank Archives Public

Dr. Binod has brought forth a valid point. He disagrees with my
suggestion that the archives of this google group must be public. I
think this small issue gives us an opportunity to hold a civil, open,
transparent debate on the question. People should fully express their
opinions.

I am glad we finally have a Global Madhesi Organization in Ram Shah's
leadership. But it is for the 67 members of this group to discuss and
decide, if necessary by vote, as to whether or not we should make the
archives public.

Here is my rationale.

(1) This is not a private club, this is not a family group. This is
the online watering hole for the leading Madhesis from all over the
world. By definition this group and its discussions belong to the 12
million Madhesis on the planet. These message threads are not private
emails. We can not take this group to the 12 million, but we should
take it to as many as possible, especially when it is so easy to do,
and free.

(2) I am opposed to Madhesis talking Madhesi rights with Madhesis but
expressing internalized prejudice and mental slavery and subservience
when among Pahadis. What are you afraid of?

(3) Making the archives public will get us more Madhesi readers, and
we will also get more requests from Madhesis who wish to join the
group and contribute to the discussions. We do want the widest
possible readership.

(4) I also want interested Pahadis to read these discussions. Let them
get informed of our raw feelings and opinions. Let's enlighten them as
to our issues.

(5) Just like there are very few Madhesis in the Nepal Army, in the
Nepal Police, in the state bureaucracy in Nepal, there are very few
Madhesis in the Nepali diaspora, and for the same reasons. This
particular google group so far has emerged as the best gathering place
for those few. A wider readership will enhance the quality of
discussions here.

(6) Too much is at stake as work gets done on the constitution. We
stand next to a loud, vocal, prejudiced Pahadi majority in the
diaspora. We have to fight back with words and ideas. This google
group could play a key role in securing the One Terai, One Pradesh.

(7) Let's go mass based.

ICG: Nepal's Faltering Peace Process

Feb 23, 6:35 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:35:32 -0500
Local: Mon, Feb 23 2009 6:35 pm
Subject: ICG: Nepal's Faltering Peace Process

ICG: Nepal's Faltering Peace Process
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/02/icg-nepals-faltering-peace-process.html

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Kya Huwa

Feb 22, 5:28 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:28:43 -0500
Local: Sun, Feb 22 2009 5:28 pm
Subject: Kya Huwa

Access: Only members can view group content

I just found out that this tank has gone opaque again. Why?

If there are members of this think tank that are opposed to keeping
the content of the discussions here public, they should participate in
a discussion on the topic and convince the rest of us as to their
rationale. This super elitism if offensive. 50 leading Madhesis in the
world get together online but wish to discuss things in a way that
denies access to other Madhesis who might manage to come online. That
is beyond weird.

The decision making process is flawed. Lobbying through private phone
calls! People should have open discussions.

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Tank, Tara, Constitution, NAC, NRN

Feb 22, 5:23 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:23:17 -0500
Local: Sun, Feb 22 2009 5:23 pm
Subject: Tank, Tara, Constitution, NAC, NRN

(1)

Because this think tank's archives are now in public, I have linked to
it from my Nepal blog. See top right:
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com Now this think tank performs the
same function for my Nepal blog that Twitter does for my Tech N Biz
blog: http://technbiz.blogspot.com

(2)

Amit Shah: ".....included the word Women, Adibashi/Janjati but
intentionally excluded the word *MADHESHI* ignoring the fact of
madheshi movement and condition in Nepal as well as in abroad."

This is an important observation. If there had been no anti-Madhesi
prejudice in Nepal there would have been 10,000 Madhesis in New York
today. The first 10,000 Pahadis I am going to meet in NYC, I am going
to think they took seats that belonged to Madhesis. Since the Nepali
diaspora is mostly a Pahadi diaspora, we can expect a major sentiment
against the sound One Terai, One Pradesh idea. We have to counter
that. This think tank could play a key role.

(3)

Tara. I learned a few weeks back that he is now NAC president.
Congrats. This looks good on NYC Nepalis. One third of the Nepalis in
the US are in NYC. Good to see the leadership has finally shifted to
the city. Now I learn he is also chair of the NRNA-NCC America. I am
learning for the first time that such a coordination council has
finally materialized in the US as well. That is great news. It is
possible at some time some Nepali in the US will lead the global NRN
movement, but for that to happen it had been important for the Nepalis
in America to get integrated with the global NRN first. For the
longest time, the NRN organization faced resistance in America because
a Madhesi was at the top.

I have tussled with Tara at times in the past on three issues - (a)
the need for an umbrella organization for the 30 plus Nepali
organizations in New York Metro, or alternately getting them all to
become members of NAC itself, (b) democracy, (c) transparency - that
some have tried to portray as some kind of a personality clash,
because there is more drama in that suggestion.
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2007/08/democracy-transparency-and-nepali.html

I still would like to emphasize the importance of democracy and
transparency for the Nepalis to earn their due political rights in NYC
and at the national level. This is about immigrant rights. Too much of
the Nepali diaspora bonding is tied to the happenings in Nepal and too
little to the rights of the Nepalis in their host countries.

What I am getting at is Nepalis should have the right to vote in New
York city elections based on residency, because you pay utility bills.
The Irish had that in Boston 150 years ago. You don't have to be a
citizen, you don't have to have a green card.

In terms of basic rights in host countries, it is much worse for the
Nepalis in the gulf states, in Malaysia, other places.

When you emphasize democracy and transparency, you also make it
possible for the diaspora organizations to go mass based. Right now
there is too much living room talk, cliquish, self-defeating.

(4)

A few weeks back Jay Mandal forwarded me this email about the
constitution. I told him I had a direct channel with Madhav Nepal on
the constitution work. That is the beauty of having a global digital
democracy organization: http://hamnep.googlepages.com and having been
the only full timer in the diaspora behind the three revolutions in
Nepal: April 2006, January-February 2007, February 2008.
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com

I have been one of the earliest to start work on a constitution. What
I have proposed would be the shortest, most progressive constitution
of any country.
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2007/11/proposed-constitution.html

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Sukhdev Shah

Feb 13, 2:29 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:29:27 -0500
Local: Fri, Feb 13 2009 2:29 pm
Subject: Sukhdev Shah

This daily digest from the Madhesi Think Tank today has been my
favorite to date for all the congratulatory messages to Dr. Sukhdev
Shah. It is a big deal, a huge deal that the Nepali ambassadors to the
US and UK are both Madhesi for the first time ever. This is a tectonic
shift.

When I was a little kid, we used to hear of Dr. Shah as someone who
was at the World Bank/IMF in the US. Then he showed up on stage with
Krishna Prasad Bhattarai in Janakpur at a Barah Bigha mass meeting
after the 1990 mass movement as someone who had helped pay for some of
BP's medical expenses. I was there at the mass meeting. He spoke mixed
Maithili-Hindi-English-Nepali. A few years later I attended his talk
program at TU in Kirtipur. I was in the back, I did not get to talk to
him one on one. He at the time said it was worse for the Madhesis in
Nepal than the blacks in America. A few years later we got to know
each other through online interactions. The first time he emailed me
the way I felt was similar to this:
http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/01/mitch-kapor-now-following-me-on-twitter.html
I was elated.

And he was a rare Madhesi who took affront at my mistreatment at the
storm-in-a-teacup Google Group called the ND Forum.
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2007/02/kiran-sitoula-is-short-fat-idiot.html

Dr. Shah became qualified when it was near impossible for Madhesis to
get qualified. And if it had not been for the anti-Madhesi prejudice
he would have been ambassador to the US a long time ago. Better late
than never. But we have not arrived yet. There is much work that still
remains.

This is a symbolic achievement. But this helps us go for the big
achievements for the masses. This is a step in the right direction. We
have to celebrate this. I look forward to a felicitation program in
his honor here in New York City.

We have to keep pushing the limits. We have to keep looking for new
goals. http://madhesi.blogspot.com/2009/02/broadband-and-madhesi-liberation.html

Hindi, Nepali, East West Railway, Sukhdev Shah

Feb 19, 3:52 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:52:36 -0500
Local: Thurs, Feb 19 2009 3:52 pm
Subject: Hindi, Nepali, East West Railway, Sukhdev Shah

(1) Leaders like Yadav-Tripathy-Mahato should learn to address Pahadi
crowds in Nepali because it is time for the three (plus) Madhesi
parties to get unified and expand into all 75 districts.
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/01/unification-of-madhesi-parties.html

(2) It is unrealistic to expect the East West railway line to connect
all the populous Terai towns. Further south you go from the Chure,
worse is the flood problem during the monsoon. Also, this is not a
railway line just for the Madhesi, but for all of Nepal, actually
especially for the hill districts. So the railways line should be as
close to the Chure as possible, just like the highway. Actually it
might not be a bad idea to have common bridges for both the highway
and the railway.

Provided the right (non-corrupt, transparent, speedy, bold, capable)
political leadership, this railway line could materialize fast through
BOOT. Build, Own, Operate, Transfer. You go for FDI. There is plenty
of money in the global marketplace. The same applies to the mega hydel
projects.

(3) I liked Sukhdev Shah saying he wishes to be an ambassador of all
Nepalis. That is the next goal for the Madhesi Movement: national
leadership.

Madhesi Gathering In Long Island

Feb 21, 5:12 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:12:38 -0500
Local: Sat, Feb 21 2009 5:12 pm
Subject: Madhesi Gathering In Long Island

https://twitter.com/paramendra/status/1235248689

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Showing off some Tweets

Feb 20, 8:10 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:10:56 -0500
Local: Fri, Feb 20 2009 8:10 pm
Subject: Showing off some Tweets

https://twitter.com/paramendra/status/1227962213 Steve Case AOL Founder
https://twitter.com/paramendra/status/1227950181 Padmasree CTO of Cisco
Joe Trippi, Dean 2004 Campaign Manager
http://twitter.com/JoeTrippi/statuses/1221127774
http://twitter.com/paramendra/statuses/1221187540
Huffington Post, top political blog in America
http://twitter.com/huffpost/statuses/1221127779

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Hindi And UML

Feb 18, 10:02 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:02:02 -0500
Local: Wed, Feb 18 2009 10:02 pm
Subject: Hindi And UML

I wish Subhashii had provided the web address for this piece of news.
But from the little information I have, I would like to express my
reaction to the event.

What was the event? Was this at the UML convention? Were Mahato, Yadav
and Tripathy invited guests? If this was at the UML convention, and if
the vast majority of those in the audience were people whose primary
language is Nepali, and we all know Mahato speaks fluent Nepali, it
might have been a good idea for Mahato to have addressed the crowd in
Nepali on his own.

On the other hand, more than 15 years ago Mirja Dil Sad Beg, then a
RPP MP, addressed a mass meeting in Sidhupalchok in Hindi.

The three Madhesi leaders speaking in Nepali does not take away from
the fact that Hindi is the natural link language in the Terai.

Another way to look at this is that there is a certain Pahadi
hostility to the Hindi language. That hostility needs to subside.
___________________________________________________________________________
Butwal...... followed by disgruntled crowd against Mahato for
addressing in Hindi, Upendra Yadav and Hridyesh Tripathi spoke in
Nepali. ...... the mass meeting and walked out. There is a need
for UMDF to be reactivated. .

Does anyone of us hold any data to prove scientifically which language
is the most feasible one to join the people of Madhesh speaking
maithili, bhojpuri, awadhi, tharu etc. However, it is now time to
integrate English in Madhesh.

Subhash Shah
London

Mahato act angers crowd

Feb 16 - The mass jeered when General Secretary of the Nepal
Sadhbhavana Party Rajendra Mahato started waxing eloquent in Hindi
instead of Nepali. Despite the protest, Mahato went on, saying, "I
don't think it's difficult to understand Hindi. Why are you objecting
to the use of Hindi when you are living in Madhesh?" "In new Nepal,
all groups should have representation," he went on, "New Nepal should
accept people, who speak different languages." A member of the
convention management committee, Ramnath Dhakal, tried to pacify the
crowd, in vain. It was then that Mahato gave in to the crowd's demand.
"This kind of mentality will not help build new Nepal," Mahato
concluded in Nepali.

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Broadband And Madhesi Liberation

Feb 11, 8:36 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:36:42 -0500
Local: Wed, Feb 11 2009 8:36 pm
Subject: Broadband And Madhesi Liberation

Broadband And Madhesi Liberation
http://madhesi.blogspot.com/2009/02/broadband-and-madhesi-liberation.html

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com

As Per The Constitution

Feb 11, 3:02 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:02:25 -0500
Local: Wed, Feb 11 2009 3:02 pm
Subject: As Per The Constitution

I think this Google Group is a pretty good place to start work on the
new constitution. I think Nepal should shoot for the shortest, most
progressive constitution in the world. The details come in the form of
laws and bills later on. This is what I have proposed since a long
time ago. What do you all think?

http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/01/unification-of-madhesi-parties.html
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2007/11/proposed-constitution.html
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-shape-federalism.html

PS. When you send emails to this think tank, please tidy it up. Only
send your writing, not the emails of everyone else in that threat
conversation, because those are already posted before you replied.

Web 5.0 Is Da Bomb

Feb 8, 8:23 am
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 07:23:50 -0500
Local: Sun, Feb 8 2009 8:23 am
Subject: Web 5.0 Is Da Bomb

Web 5.0 Is Da Bomb
http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/02/web-50-is-da-bomb.html

I Get Twitter

Jan 28, 6:08 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:08:33 -0500
Local: Wed, Jan 28 2009 6:08 pm
Subject: I Get Twitter

I Get Twitter
http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/01/i-get-twitter.html

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com

Madhesi Gathering: Shangrila: Jay Kishan Heights: New Year (humor piece)

Jan 13, 4:21 pm
From: "Paramendra Bhagat"
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:21:50 -0500
Local: Tues, Jan 13 2009 4:21 pm
Subject: Madhesi Gathering: Shangrila: Jay Kishan Heights: New Year (humor piece)

Madhesi Gathering: Shangrila: Jay Kishan Heights: New Year
http://madhesi.blogspot.com/2009/01/madhesi-gathering-shangrila-jay-kishan.html

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com

Global Madhesi Organization

Nov 16 2008, 10:32 pm
From: "Paramendra Bhagat"
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:32:15 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 16 2008 10:32 pm
Subject: Global Madhesi Organization

http://madhesi.blogspot.com/2008/11/global-madhesi-organization.html


--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sunday, April 05, 2009

Madhesh Think Tank: Sukhdev Sah, Tharu Movement, Dalit

NASA sealImage via Wikipedia

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank (private)

NASA Satellite Image: Forest Fires in Nepal

Mar 13, 10:25 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Mar 13 2009 10:25 pm
Subject: NASA Satellite Image: Forest Fires in Nepal

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=37518

Let us support Tharu Movement

Mar 11, 1:07 am
From: paramendra
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 11 2009 1:07 am
Subject: Re: Let us support Tharu Movement

After Tharu Movement, Dalit, Muslim And Women's Movements
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/03/after-tharu-movement-dalit-muslim-and.html

I wholeheartedly support the ongoing Tharu movement, I have from the
very beginning. I go one step further to say I look forward to the
Dalits, Muslims and women of the Terai similary rising up, similarly
waking up to claim their due share at the table.

Neither the Pahadi parties - Maoist, UML, NC - nor the Madhesi parties
have done right by the Tharus, the Dalits, the Muslims and the women.

Terai's first satellite TV channel launched

Mar 11, 1:05 am
From: paramendra
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 11 2009 1:05 am
Subject: Re: Terai's first satellite TV channel launched

This is great.

Happy Holi

Mar 11, 12:24 am
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:24:47 -0400
Local: Wed, Mar 11 2009 12:24 am
Subject: Happy Holi

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm17BPGvZSc

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

News reg Sukhdev Sah

Baburam Bhattarai: Proposed Constitution

Mar 3, 2:36 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:36:05 -0500
Local: Tues, Mar 3 2009 2:36 pm
Subject: Baburam Bhattarai: Proposed Constitution

Baburam Bhattarai: Proposed Constitution
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/03/baburam-bhattarai-proposed-constitution.html

--
http://paramendrabhagat.blogspot.com
http://jyoticonnect.googlepages.com

Baburam.Constitution.doc
150K View Download

TweetDeck, Power Twitter, Twitter Globe, Better Than Facebook

Mar 3, 1:24 am
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:24:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Mar 3 2009 1:24 am
Subject: TweetDeck, Power Twitter, Twitter Globe, Better Than Facebook

TweetDeck, Power Twitter, Twitter Globe, Better Than Facebook
http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/03/tweetdeck-power-twitter-twitter-globe.html

Dalits are not Madhesi

Feb 28, 12:46 am
From: paramendra
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 28 2009 12:46 am
Subject: Our Contribution To A New Constitution

I think this vibrant thread shows members of this think tank have an
important role to play in the making of a new constitution for Nepal.

I am going to study this constitution draft uploaded to this thread by
Bal Krishna Jha:

National Coalition Against Racial Discrimination: Proposed
Constitution
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/02/national-coalition-against-racial.html

I skimmed through it. I think it looks great.

Those who have followed my blog (http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com)
for the past few years know I have taken my proposed constitution for
Nepal through many drafts.

Some questions I ask are;

(1) Why are people hellbent on drafting a really long and wordy
constitution? Why should we not shoot to write the shortest
constitution in the world? A lot of issues that should go into laws
and bylaws to be passed by a parliament people are trying to put into
the constitution.

(2) I think the map for federalism is less important than the formula
for power distribution between the center and the states. What if they
do agree to One Terai, One State, and create three or five states in
the hills and then say in the upper house each state will have 20
representatives? Then? That would bring forth a permanent colonization
of the Terai.

(3) Should we or should we not retain the current 75 districts? That
is a key question.

(4) Should we go for ethnic federalism or geographic federalism?

(5) Should we not adopt multi-member constituencies for elections to
the lower house? That is the most popular form of elections in the
world.

http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2007/11/proposed-constitution.html
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2009/01/what-shape-federalism.html

My personal thing to say is these below are the two most important
goals for the next constitution.

(1) Turn Nepal into a multi-party democracy of state-funded parties.
That one provision will turn Nepal into the number one democracy on
the planet.
(2) Make sure at least one third of the legislature is female by law.

Mar 1, 1:12 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:12:57 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Mar 1 2009 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: Dalits are not Madhesi

The Dalits, Muslism and Tharus in the Terai don't feel Madhesi the
same way we Madhesis don't feel Nepali. We are going to have to face
the fact that the Dalits, Muslims, Tharus and women in the Terai have
been marginalized. That acknowledgement is fundamental to getting them
to join us in the larger struggle against Pahadi suppression that is
wholesale. The Pahadis don't discriminate between Madhesi Dalits,
Madhesi women, Madhesi Muslims, Madhesi Tharus, Madhesi Yadavs,
Madhesi Babhans. They suppress all indiscriminately. And in the case
of the Tharus in western Terai, their suppression is totally at the
hands of the Pahadis.

Reply to Bijay Risal

Mar 1, 1:26 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Mar 1 2009 1:26 pm
Subject: Reply to Bijay Risal

Reply to Bijay Risal
UNITED WE STAND AND DIVIDED WE FALL
http://bijayrisal.blogspot.com/2009/02/united-we-stand-and-divided-we-all.html

Bijayji. You make it sound like the only way Nepal will stay intact is
if the DaMaJaMa shut up. That if they complain of injustice, the
country will break up. That those who complain of racism are the ones
who are racist. I am alarmed that an educated person like you can not
do better by the task of creating a new Nepal. A more just Nepal will
be a more united Nepal, a federal Nepal will be a stronger Nepal, but
if that is not true, if a more just Nepal will not be a more united
Nepal, that Nepal deserves to break up into pieces.

Strategy that Madhesi should understand quickly

Mar 1, 1:02 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:02:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Mar 1 2009 1:02 pm
Subject: Re: Strategy that Madhesi should understand quickly
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Reply to Lalit Jha:
Internalized Racism Among Nepalis In NYC
demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/05/internalized-racism-among-nepalis-
in.html
Madhesi Self Hate
demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/08/madhesi-self-hate.html
MaMaMaMa
demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/06/mamamama.html
मधेशीसँग संख्या छ ...
demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/05/blog-post.html
Bahun, Chhetri, Sunni
demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/06/bahun-chhetri-sunni.html

Lalitji. You have brought forth a very important topic. We have to
discuss this frankly. I especially draw your attention to this:

Madhesi Self Hate
demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/08/madhesi-self-hate.html

We spend too much too much time talking about Pahadi bad behavior, and
too little time talking about Madhesi bad behavior, and I mean not
only the infighting among the Madhesi masses back in Nepal, but also
sometimes strange behavior by the by definition elite Madhesis in
America and elsewhere.

Curiously it has been my observation that the Pahadis in NYC are like
the Madhesis in Nepal: powerless. And are similarly guilty of much
internalized racism.

Internalized Racism Among Nepalis In NYC
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/05/internalized-racism-among-nepalis-in.html
Madhesi Self Hate
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/08/madhesi-self-hate.html
MaMaMaMa
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/06/mamamama.html
मधेशीसँग संख्या छ ...
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/05/blog-post.html
Bahun, Chhetri, Sunni
http://demrepubnepal.blogspot.com/2006/06/bahun-chhetri-sunni.html




Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Madhesh Think Tank: Board

Terraced farming on the foothills of the Himal...Image via Wikipedia

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank (private)

Summary of the Discussion on taking this Think Tank to the next level

Mar 24, 10:53 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 24 2009 10:53 pm
Subject: Summary of the Discussion on taking this Think Tank to the next level

The majority opinion seems to be to keep this think tank as is. There
are people who want to go back to the founding principles. I don't buy
into that. Nepal was founded as a monarchy. So it never should have
become a republic, right? And there is the Biplav Yadav school of
thought that says this think tank has not attained the maturity level
to go public and hold elections. I see that to be true. And then there
are people who are worried if the conversations here go public then
that might hurt their careers and/or social standings. That would be a
practical matter. But then can you imagine the martyrs getting
practical and saving their lives?

For now I rest my case. Ram Sah and I both want to make the archives
public. But I guess we will have to wait until the majority opinion
gets there. That is the democratic way.

The status quo thought is the thought of a backward community that
wishes to stay backward. That is my observation. I guess I get to
focus more on my own organization: http://hamnep.googlepages.com

Resolution

Mar 25, 5:19 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 25 2009 5:19 pm
Subject: Resolution

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesi Now that this is no longer a
mailing list, but a public forum, I think this
http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank can continue as is.
I am glad I brought up ideas and ignited some discussion, but I have
decided to respect the majority opinion with equal enthusiasm. I guess
people do face the public as they move about in their various spheres,
but they like to come back to this private group as their watering
hole. The relaxed atmosphere is due to the group being private. I
appreciate that. I mean, I still think making the archives public
would be more beneficial to the Madhesi cause, but I am for free
speech, freewheeling discussion, but I am also for respecting majority
opinion. Let's keep at it. Manjil ek aur rahi do, phir pyar kaise na
ho? I don't doubt any member's commitment to the Madhesi cause, it is
just that we don't always agree on how best to serve the cause, and
that is okay. Kunda Kunda Pani, Munda Munda Buddhi. If we were to not
have disagreements, we would not need a group, one person would be
enough.

Thanks Ram Sah and Himanshu Shekhar for sticking out your necks.
Thanks Ram Manohar for coming up with a creative resolution to the
"crisis." And I don't think I ever underappreciated BJDJ's work as
this group's administrator, and he does not feel another way. It is
all cool.

I talked to Google through Twitter, and it worked.

Mar 26, 3:49 pm
From: Paramendra Bhagat
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:49:19 -0400
Local: Thurs, Mar 26 2009 3:49 pm
Subject: I talked to Google through Twitter, and it worked.

http://twitter.com/paramendra/status/1396372381

Mar 26, 4:48 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Mar 26 2009 4:48 pm
Subject: Re: I talked to Google through Twitter, and it worked.

http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/03/i-talked-to-google-through-twitter-and.html

FM Yadav's advisor accused of embezzlement of funds

Mar 25, 4:22 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 25 2009 4:22 pm
Subject: Re: FM Yadav's advisor accused of embezzlement of funds

First they said the Tharu movement was against the Madhesis when the
truth is the Tharus have been subjugated for centuries by the Pahadi
rulers. Then they said the Muslims are also against the Madhesis just
like the Tharus.

I do not doubt the Tharus and the Muslims have been marginalized and
have their own unique identities.

But so do Bahuns and Chhetris. They also have their own unique
identities. But they are very much part of the larger Pahadi identity.
You don't see Bahuns agitating to say we are not Pahadi, we are
Bahun.

Tharus, Muslims, Dalits are all Madhesi, but they have genuine
grienvances within that pan Madhesi identity. For reservation purposes
it might not be a bad idea to have separate quotas for the Tharus, the
Muslims and the Terai Dalits. On the other hand, if you were to have
one quota for Dalits, all the Pahadi Dalits will benefit, and the
Madhesi Dalits will be left high and dry. Similarly, if the Tharus
were to become part of the larger Janajati category for reservation
purposes, their quota will get eaten up by the Pahadi Janajatis.

We have legitimate caste, class, gender, ethnicity issues within the
pan Madhesi identity, and I am for addressing those because only that
way will we be able to create a more healthy Madhesi identity. I
really do want the Tharus, the Muslims and the Dalits to wake up. But
instead they want to go from one form of sleep to another. They have
shown the tendency to become pawns at the hands of the Pahadi ruling
class. We have to watch out. We have to engage them. We have to open
dialogue with them.

Second they attacked Suman which is a way of attacking the MPRF party
president Upendra Yadav. Like Ratanji says, this is the same CIAA that
jailed Deuba on behalf of the king, the same CIAA that harassed Jay
Prakash Gupta. And we have to fight back. I want to know if the Maoist
leadership had anything to do with this.

Heck, they also attacked Sukhdev Sah for having a green cad. For
having a green card! Of all things. The way they talk about Sah's
green card you would think a green card is some kind of cocaine.

Election Timetable For The Madhesh Think Tank Board -- April 2009

Mar 23, 7:04 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 7:04 pm
Subject: Election Timetable For The Madhesh Think Tank Board -- April 2009

(1) All individuals wanting to be Board members will have to declare
candidacy by April 7 midnight EST. They may do so by replying to this
message, by emailing madhesh-think-tank@googlegroups.com You can run
for Chairperson, or Board Member - 3 slots. There are four positions
open. The current Administrator will remain in place for one year.
(2) The ballot will be made public by April 10.
(3) All votes will have to be in by April 17. Each member gets to cast
four votes. Send your votes by email to madhesh-think-
tank@googlegroups.com
(4) Final results are to be published by April 20.
(5) The new Board comes into office on April 21.

http://madhesi5.googlepages.com

Paramendra Bhagat
Election Volunteer

Mar 23, 8:40 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 8:40 pm
Subject: Re: Election Timetable For The Madhesh Think Tank Board -- April 2009

Board member of the Madhesh Think Tank Board. Would you be interested?
Thanks.

Mar 23, 10:08 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 10:08 pm
Subject: Re: Election Timetable For The Madhesh Think Tank Board -- April 2009

Lalit Jha: " In regards to this forum, suggest that we continue to
focus on recruiting more members and encourage
more participation and more volunteers."

That is precisely what I want to happen. But you can't keep doing the
same thing, and expect a different result.

I want us to have more members, more participation, and that is why I
am proposing what I am proposing. I am aware I am pushing people out
of their comfort zones. But that is the least we can do for the
Madhesi cause from the comfort of our First World lives.

Mar 23, 10:29 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 10:29 pm
Subject: Re: Election Timetable For The Madhesh Think Tank Board -- April 2009

My proposals should not bother any existing member who has liked the
old ways. Nothing has to change for you if you don't like the
changes.

(1) You can't complain that you now receive too many emails. Go here
and change your settings: http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank/subscribe
If you have chosen to receive a daily digest, you of course only read
the emails you wish to read, you sure don't have to read any or all.
On the other hand you can choose to receive no emails at all, you can
decide you want to go the site itself and read select messages online.
http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank

(2) You don't have to sit on the Board if you don't want to. You don't
have to vote if you don't want to.

(3) Your right to write on any topic of your choice has not changed.
If anything that right is now even more entrenched.

I am working to take this group to the next level, that is all.
100-200 people claiming to be among the top Madhesis have an
obligation to the 13 million Madhesis. That is all.

Largest Madhesi Mailing List In The World Now Largest Online Madhesi Forum

Mar 25, 4:13 am
From: paramendra
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 25 2009 4:13 am
Subject: Largest Madhesi Mailing List In The World Now Largest Online Madhesi Forum

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesi
1400 plus Members
All members can post.
Each member is now set to receive Daily Digests. Please go change your
settings if that is not what you want. http://groups.google.com/group/madhesi/subscribe

Thank you Ram Manohar for the suggestion.

Mar 24, 10:34 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 24 2009 10:34 pm
Subject: Re: Suggestion / Request

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesi/about This group has 1400 plus
Madhesi members, but it is a mailing list, the largest Madhesi mailing
list in the world, not a discussion forum. I could not possibly open
it up and turn it into a discussion forum. The archives at that group
have always been public.

http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-think-tank This group on the
other hand has members who lead Madhesi organizations all over the
world, and others are people known personally by at least one other
member. So this group is more of a community, and a discussion forum.

Mar 23, 3:46 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 3:46 pm
Subject: Re: HI

Of all the Madhesi diaspora organizations, AIMSA is my favorite. I am
so proud of these people.

Mar 22, 10:03 am
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 10:03 am
Subject: Re: Request to add new member

Ram Sah: "In my view, it is time to think of taking this group/forum
to still higher level. In my discussion with Lalit Jha Ji yesterday,
the thing emerged that we create a Madhesh Think Tank website and
provide opportunity for
Madhesh-related organizations to be linked to this website. What do
you think?"

There are two things that can be done to take this think tank to the
next level.

(1) Make the archives public so all those Madhesis who are not members
can still read the messages and follow the discussions. That much
widership (which gets measured by Google) will also enhance the
discussions here. We have to turn this into some kind of a cyber
parliament for the leading Madhesis of the world.

(2) Keep adding members to the group. Bring in more leading Madhesis
from all parts of the world, especially from inside Nepal.

PS. I have already linked to this think tank from my blog on Nepal.
But that link makes no sense if the archives are not public.

Mar 22, 10:08 am
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 07:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 10:08 am
Subject: Re: Request to add new member

Ram Sah: "......... taking this group/forum to still higher
level......What do you think?"

Also, members should delete the original message (s) from the body of
their email (s) when sending replies to be posted/dispatched to the
rest of the members. Just retain the subject line and maybe a line or
two from the original message that you are responding to. Otherwise
messages end up looking so untidy.

Some Ways To Improve This Think Tank

Mar 22, 6:24 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 6:24 pm
Subject: Re: Paul Soren: New member request

I think it would be a very good idea to accept Paul Soren's request
for membership. For members we should have Madhesis AND friends of
Madhesh. Someone like Soren can help spread the word, that helps the
Madhesi cause.

Soon I am going to be writing proposed guidelines for this Think Tank
that I would want to throw for feedback, criticism and circulation.

Mar 23, 12:46 am
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 12:46 am
Subject: Re: Paul Soren: New member request

There are a few things I would like to point out.

(1) It is okay for people to disagree. Actually disagreements are
welcome. We need live debates. The emphasis should not be on lack of
disagreements and a snuffing out of differences in opinion. The
emphasis should be on respectful disagreements. When we can not agree,
we respectfully disagree.

(2) I like the idea of seeking consensus, but when we can't, we have
to learn to vote. Majority opinion gets to carry the day.

(3) Because this think tank is cyber/virtual, to some people it is not
"real." To me it is very real.

(4) To some people words are merely words, not action. I say words are
action too.

(5) When you bring (3) and (4) together, you come to realize this
think tank is a vibrant virtual organization where a lot of work gets
done.

(6) This think tank has 75 members but less than 10 active members,
and barely about five very active members. That is too little. If we
were to have 200 members, we might end up with 20 active members, and
that would be better. So let's expand.

(7) This think tank is the only place I know where the leading members
of the global Madhesi diaspora congregate. I think having a five
member Board would be a great idea.

(8) I don't understand why we should be scared of democracy and
transparency.

(9) As for the Paul Soren issue, that is an excellent topic to bring
up for an open vote. Give a deadline by which interested members
should have voted, and let people vote. My vote is to bring him in.

Mar 23, 4:08 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 4:08 pm
Subject: Re: Paul Soren: New member request

This has become an interesting thread.

(1) Should we only allow Madhesis into this think tank? If so, then
define Madhesi. A Bahun living in the Terai is not Madhesi, at least
by the Nepal Sarkar's definition. Is Tharu Madhesi? Is Muslim Madhesi?
If we are open only to Madhesi members, are we open to ALL Madhesi
members? So any Madhesi with an email address can request membership?
Or does an applicant have to be personally known by at least one
existing member of the group? Even if this think tank is to keep at
its current ways, we need to come up with a definition of who a member
is.

(2) This think tank is guilty of a certain elitism. My instincts are
more egalitarian, open, democratic, transparent, heading towards mass
based.

(3) What is the purpose of this group? Is the purpose that Bijay Raut
convinces Ratan Jha and Ratan Jha convinces Binod Shah and Binod Shah
convinces Biplav Yadav and Biplav Yadav convinces Vijay Kumar and
Vijay Kumar convinces Ram Manohar Sah and Ram Manohar Sah convinces
Ram Sah and Ram Sah convinces Subhash Sah? What we have right now is
an echo chamber. This is a major disservice to the Madhesi cause. The
purpose of this think tank is not, should not be that 70 elitist
Madhesis can help each other out, reach out to each other, and massage
each other's egos, that we are the chosen few feeling of elitism. The
purpose should be to bring together the top 70, or the top 200
Madhesis in the world to see what we can do for the 13 million
Madhesis on the planet. If we are not even open to sharing our
communication with at least those members of that 13 million who might
be online in the various Terai towns and various parts of the world,
then this think tank feels like constipation.

(4) Ram Sah, Lalit Jha and I seem to be in agreement on this one.

(5) Of course Bijay Raut does not want elections, because if there are
elections next year he might no longer be Administrator. I am with
Subhash Sah on this one. We need a structure. That way we will be more
efficient, more productive. Periodic elections will make us more
healthy as a group.

(6) And I am suspicious of Ratan Jha being for a global Madhesi
organization first, but then coming out against the idea once Ram
Sah's name got proposed for that organization's leadership. Now he is
opposed to having an elected Board for this think tank. I am
suspicious. I am suspicious of people who want to hold leadership
positions but who are scared of elections.

(7) On the Soren issue, you could argue just like a non Nepali can not
become a MP in Nepal so a Soren does not get to join this think tank.
But that decision has to be preceded by debate and discussion. I am
glad we are talking.

(8) http://madhesi5.googlepages.com As to my candidacy, this is what I
have to say. I am the person who launched ANTA in New York, where its
biggest presence in America still is. I was part of the conversations
that launched AIMSA, my favorite Madhesi diaspora organization, and
ANMUK. I poured more time and energy into the Madhesi Kranti of
January February 2007 than any other diaspora Madhesi. I am the
ultimate digital democrat among the Nepalis outside Nepal. But then I
also was one of the top Obama volunteers in all of NYC, so it is not
like I am only digital. Lead, follow, or get out of the way.

Mar 23, 4:19 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 4:19 pm
Subject: Re: Paul Soren: New member request

"Access: Only members can view group content"

Some reasons not to make the archives public.

(1) Oh no, all my Pahadi friends who are only friends with me because
I don't talk Madhesi rights in their presence will find out that I do
talk Madhesi rights in private, and once they find out, they are no
longer going to be friends with me.

(2) I am different from the Madhesi masses, I am better. I am above
them. If a Madhesi who can come online from Janakpur can access the
archives just like I can, then how am I better than that Janakpur
Madhesi?

(3) I am too lazy to engage my other elite Madhesi friends over email.
To me this think tank is like an email account. So it has to stay
private.

Mar 23, 5:36 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 5:36 pm
Subject: Re: Paul Soren: New member request

"In response to Paramendra's usual long email (you think too fast, my
friend!), I would like to reiterate what Ratan ji said it very
succintly in his earlier email: "Regarding running this Forum, all we
need is few dedicated members (Volunteers) who can streamline and
steer the discussion, sometime involving serious and sensitive/
complicated issues, to a logical/rational end which will be of value
to Madheshi people and its leadership. That was the founding mission
of establishing this Think Tank. It'd become unmanageable if we dig
too much into formalities.""

So because Ratan Jha says something, it is right? I don't buy into
that. Ratan Jha is only one among the 70 plus votes in this forum.
Most often what Ratan Jha says makes sense to me as well, but what we
are talking about here is democracy, not one person. There is no
compromising with the democratic process.

We have to move with the speed of the needs of the Madhesi cause, we
can't try and force the Madhesi cause to move at our lethargic pace.

Ratan Jha's sentiment might have made sense during the early months of
this group, but now it is time to go along with Ram Sah's and Lalit
Jha's sentiment, which is that it is time to take this group to the
next level.

Taj Mohammad Miya: It’s unclear who Madhesis are

Mar 23, 4:44 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 4:44 pm
Subject: Taj Mohammad Miya: It’s unclear who Madhesis are

http://www.kantipuronline.com/interview.php?&nid=185948
Joint National Muslim Struggle Committee (JNMSC)

My comment: We have to face the fact that Muslims in the Terai towns
don't exactly experience equality. Socio-economically they lag behind.
The problems with having one big quota for Madhesi reservations is all
the Yadava and Jhas and Sah will benefit, and the Tharu, Dalit, Muslim
and women will get left behind. Perhaps the Madhesi Dalits, the
Madhesi Muslims and the Tharus, and the Madhesi women need their own
separate quotas in the 45% reservations promised in public sector
jobs.

Twitter, Facebook

Mar 23, 1:40 am
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Twitter, Facebook

https://twitter.com
http://www.facebook.com

I recommend all members of this think tank sign up for these two
social networks online. They are great ways to connect between people
who hardly ever get to meet in person, which would be us. Through
Facebook we get to share pictures of Madhesi events worldwide. We get
to comment on the pictures.

https://twitter.com/paramendra
http://technbiz.blogspot.com/2009/03/cisco-unified-computing-system-to-tidy.html

Mar 23, 3:45 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 23 2009 3:45 pm
Subject: Re: Twitter, Facebook

http://madhesi.ning.com

This is a great site that Surendraji has created. I just signed up. I
encourage others to do the same.

MJF Split: What Does It Mean?

Mar 22, 9:58 am
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 9:58 am
Subject: MJF Split: What Does It Mean?

MJF dissidents float new party
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2009/mar/mar22/news08.php

(१) Mao long ago noticed every time he expelled half the members of
his central committee, the party overall doubled in size. This split
might mean the MJF will grow.
(२) These MJF leaders are not that influential. The party stays the
same as before.
(३) This split means the party has lost between one quarter to one
third of its strength.

Which do you think it is?

Proposed Guidelines For The Madhesh Think Tank

Mar 22, 7:02 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Mar 22 2009 7:02 pm
Subject: Proposed Guidelines For The Madhesh Think Tank

(Rough draft being sent out for circulation)

http://madhesi5.googlepages.com

(1) The Madhesh Think Tank (http://groups.google.com/group/madhesh-
think-tank
) will attempt to bring in as members all the leading
Madhesis on the planet in whatever field. But The Madhesh Think Tank
will not limit itself to such leading members. Any Madhesi or friend
of Madhesh may request to become a Member. Whey they do so, they will
have to submit their brief bio which will be made public to the group
upon approval. Existing members may propose new members. A majority
vote of the Board will approve membership requests.
(2) The Madhesh Think Tank will have two administrators at any one
time, one active, one dormant.
(3) The Madhesh Think Tank will have a five member Board to be
elected annually. Any member of the Think Tank may seek to be a Board
member. If there are more than five contestants, an election will be
held. All members get to cast five votes each. The top five vote
getters win. The Board will make all final decisions on who to approve
for membership or not within the guidelines below that have been
passed by the membership at large. The active administrator will be a
de facto member of the Board for the first year, but for subsequent
years will have to be elected. The Chairperson of the Board will the
dormant administrator. Five slots: Chairperson of the Board,
Administrator, Board Member, Board Member, Board Member. If someone
running for Chairperson loses the election, but is still one of the
top five vote getters, that person gets to become a Board Member. Each
person contesting gets to submit a max 100 word profile of themselves
to the Board that will then put all of them together and send them out
at once to make a case as to why they deserve to win. The 100 words
may include web addresses. That is the only campaigning that will be
allowed. All Board meetings will be conducted over email.
(4) All voting to do with The Madhesh Think Tank will be open. As in
people will send in their votes over email, and the final tally will
be made public as to who voted for what, whom. Members will have to
have cast their votes by the deadline set for each vote. The outgoing
Board will act as the Election Commission for the next Board.
(5) The Madhesh Think Tank will keep its archives public. But only
members may participate in the discussions.
(6) The Madhesh Think Tank is a free speech domain, but obscenity,
profanity, and defamatory language is discouraged.
(7) The Madhesh Think Tank Board has a right to expel members through
majority vote. Expelled members have a right to appeal any such
decision. All five Board members then get to make a second decision
that will be final, but each Board member will have to explain as to
why they decided the way they decided, and the explanations will be
made public in The Madhesh Think Tank. A new Board may revisit that
decision.

(I hereby declare my candidacy for Chairperson of the Board)

Mar 22, 7:41 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Proposed Guidelines For The Madhesh Think Tank

http://madhesi5.googlepages.com

Let's set a deadline for the end of March.

All feedback to these guidelines will have to be submitted by the end
of this month. All votes for and against these guidelines will have to
be submitted by the end of the month when it will be tallied.

Once we have the guidelines by the end of the month, then we hold
elections.

All individuals wanting to be Board members will have to declare
candidacy by April 7. The ballot will be made public by April 10. All
votes will have to be in by April 17. Results are to be published by
April 20. The new Board comes into office on April 21.

And this entire thing happens in a transparent fashion in real time,
right here at this think tank.

http://madhesi5.googlepages.com

Student Elections: How Did The Madhesi Parties Do?

Mar 21, 10:53 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:53:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 21 2009 10:53 pm
Subject: Student Elections: How Did The Madhesi Parties Do?

The Pahadi media has news only of the three Pahadi parties. How did
the Madhesi parties do in the student elections?

And also. Welcome Saritaji to this think tank. Saritaji and I were
both Vice General Secretaries to the Nepal Samajwadi Janata Dal in the
mid 90s. Our party had two MPs.

And Welcome Purushottam Shah. Janakpur guy. BNKS graduate. College
student in America.

Mar 21, 10:58 pm
From: paramendra
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Mar 21 2009 10:58 pm
Subject: Re: Student Elections: How Did The Madhesi Parties Do?

ANNFSU lead continues in FSU polls
http://www.nepalnews.com/archive/2009/mar/mar21/news05.php

...... only five campuses are left to announce the polls
results. ....... ANNFSU has won FSU presidents in 92 campuses
including whole of its panels in 65 campuses.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]